论文标题

六个超新星祖细胞的失踪

The disappearances of six supernova progenitors

论文作者

Van Dyk, Schuyler D., de Graw, Asia, Baer-Way, Raphael, Zheng, WeiKang, Filippenko, Alexei V., Fox, Ori D., Smith, Nathan, Brink, Thomas G., de Jaeger, Thomas, Kelly, Patrick L., Vasylyev, Sergiy S.

论文摘要

作为较大完整的哈勃太空望远镜(HST)快照程序的一部分,我们在高空间分辨率上观察了附近六个附近的核心偏圈超新星(SNE)的地点:SN 2012A,SN 2013EJ,SN 2016GKG,SN 2016GKG,SN 2017EAW,SN 2017EAW,SN 2018ZD,2018ZD和SN 2018AOQ。这些观察结果均在每个SN的演变中都足够晚的时间进行,以证明在每种情况下在每种情况下在预探索成像数据中鉴定出的大型祖先候选者确实消失了,因此很可能是实际的祖先。但是,我们已经确定SN 2016Gkg,祖先候选人很可能是由两个物体组成的:祖先本身可能消失了,而另一个紧密的恒星。因此,我们提供了对祖先特性的修订估计:一个二进制系统在爆炸时具有氢分裂的原发性恒星,有效温度〜6300--7900 K,骨体的光度〜10^{4.65} l_sun,radius 〜118---154-1154-154 R_SUN,R_SUN和最初的质量9.5.5.5-11 m_sun。利用延迟时间的额外档案HST数据几乎与我们的快照同时发生,我们还表明SN 2017EAW具有发光的紫外线过量,这是由于SN冲击与预先存在的杂物事物的持续相互作用而得到解释的。我们提供警告,特别是在SN 2013EJ的情况下,SN Dust的晦涩可能损害我们的结论。该样本增加了越来越多的已确认或可能的核心爆发SN祖细胞的清单。

As part of a larger completed Hubble Space Telescope (HST) Snapshot program, we observed the sites of six nearby core-collapse supernovae (SNe) at high spatial resolution: SN 2012A, SN 2013ej, SN 2016gkg, SN 2017eaw, SN 2018zd, and SN 2018aoq. These observations were all conducted at sufficiently late times in each SN's evolution to demonstrate that the massive-star progenitor candidate identified in each case in pre-explosion imaging data had indeed vanished and was therefore most likely the actual progenitor. However, we have determined for SN 2016gkg that the progenitor candidate was most likely a blend of two objects: the progenitor, which itself has likely vanished, and another closely-neighbouring star. We thus provide a revised estimate of that progenitor's properties: a binary system with a hydrogen-stripped primary star at explosion with effective temperature ~6300--7900 K, bolometric luminosity ~10^{4.65} L_sun, radius ~118--154 R_sun, and initial mass 9.5--11 M_sun. Utilising late-time additional archival HST data nearly contemporaneous with our Snapshots, we also show that SN 2017eaw had a luminous ultraviolet excess, which is best explained as a result of ongoing interaction of the SN shock with pre-existing circumstellar matter. We offer the caveat, particularly in the case of SN 2013ej, that obscuration from SN dust may be compromising our conclusions. This sample adds to the growing list of confirmed or likely core-collapse SN progenitors.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源