论文标题
量子非局部性：自然如何？
Quantum nonlocality: How does nature do it?
论文作者
论文摘要
在最近的一句话中，Hance and Hossenfelder（Arxiv：2211.01331）回想起“量子力学的因果关系完成，如果它们违反了假设（称为统计独立性或测量独立性），则隐藏变量在任何方面都不取决于依赖于测量的依赖性的依赖性，从而违反了统计性，因此违反了依赖的依赖性。独立”。但是，Hance和Hossenfelder还认为“我们应该（...）寻找可以区分两个不同选择的独立实验证据：非本地性和统计独立性，或统计独立性的局部性和违反统计独立性的行为”，“不愿意考虑没有统计独立性的理论可能是我们在本地统计学上没有统计独立性的原因，这可能是基础的一致性的，这是一致的。在这里，我们记得有第三种选择，即，拒绝测量结果以任何方式由隐藏变量控制。此外，我们认为，在寻找原则的一些结果中，列出了贝尔和科钦 - 塞皮克上下文的量子相关性集合，指出，这第三种选择在科学上更为合理，并回答了自然原因和如何产生量子非局部性的问题。
In a recent note, Hance and Hossenfelder (arXiv:2211.01331) recall that "locally causal completions of quantum mechanics are possible, if they violate the assumption [called statistical independence or measurement independence] that the hidden variables do not in any way depend on measurement settings" and that, consequently, the experimental violations of Bell inequalities "show that maintaining local causality requires violating statistical independence". However, Hance and Hossenfelder also argue that "we should (...) look for independent experimental evidence that can distinguish the two different options: non-locality and statistical independence, or locality and violations of statistical independence" and that "the unwillingness to consider theories without statistical independence may be the reason we do not yet have a locally causal theory for the foundations of physics that is consistent with general relativity". Here, we recall that there is a third option, namely, rejecting that measurement outcomes are governed in any way by hidden variables. Moreover, we argue that some recent results in the search for principles singling out the sets of quantum correlations for Bell and Kochen-Specker contextuality scenarios point out that this third option is scientifically more plausible and answers the question of why and how nature produces quantum nonlocality.
