论文标题
使用Gaia检测单脱位的巨大二进制文件:蓝色超级巨人的影响,三元组,质量精度和高精度视差要求
Detection of single-degenerate massive binaries with Gaia: The impact of blue supergiants, triples, mass precision, and high-precision parallax requirements
论文作者
论文摘要
具有数百个具有大量主序列伴侣(OB+BHS)的黑洞可以从Gaia天文学中鉴定出具有星体质量比率功能(AMRF)。我们研究了蓝色超级伴侣(BSG)而不是矮人的影响,以及盖亚(Gaia)尚未解决的系统中存在其他伴侣对OB+BHS的星体鉴定的影响。我们还探讨了主要质量需要约束的准确性。此外,我们评估了最新的Gaia数据发行中的天体二进制轨道的高精度发布限制DR3如何影响OB+BHS的检测。我们建立了BSG质量质量关系并计算BSG AMRF曲线。我们通过OB或BSG初选的非统一和单分化的大规模二进制和三元组的模拟种群,我们可以评估假阳性鉴定部分以及BSG AMRF曲线的效果。我们使用保守的DR3发布标准将第二个Alma发光星目录(ALSII)中的恒星数量与第二个ALMA发光星目录(ALSII)中的恒星数量与OB+BH检测的新预测。预计BSG的初选和三倍不会影响假阳性识别率。但是,如果主要恒星的进化阶段未知,则仍然建议使用BSG曲线。这也大大减少了OB+BH识别率。不需要知道主要的质量可以从OB+BHS的高识别部分中受益,同时保持假阳性较低的比例。我们在DR3轨道中的ALS II中没有发现OB+BH候选者。该零检测不能归因于基本的BH构型方案,而是归因于严格的DR3选择标准。为了推断Gaia的BH形式场景,我们建议DR4中对相对视差精度的约束应比DR3标准少95%。(删节)
Hundreds of black holes with massive main-sequence companions (OB+BHs) might be identified from Gaia astrometry with the Astrometric Mass-Ratio Function (AMRF). We investigate the impact of blue supergiant companions (BSG) instead of dwarfs and the presence of additional companions in the system that are unresolved by Gaia on the astrometric identification of OB+BHs. We also explore how accurate the primary mass needs to be constrained. Moreover, we assess how the high-precision publishing constraints of astrometric binary orbits in the latest Gaia data release DR3 impact the detection of OB+BHs. We establish a BSG mass-magnitude relation and compute BSG AMRF curves. From a mock population of non- and single-degenerate massive binaries and triples with OB or BSG primaries, we asses the false-positive identification fraction and the effect of the BSG AMRF curves. We compare the number of stars with astrometric DR3 orbits in the second Alma Luminous Star catalogue (ALSII) with new predictions on the OB+BH detection using the conservative DR3 publishing criteria. BSG primaries and triples are not expected to impact the false-positive identification fractions significantly. However, if the evolutionary stage of the primary star is unknown, the usage of the BSG curves is still recommended. This also reduces the OB+BH identification fraction significantly. The primary mass does not need to be known to benefit from the high identification fraction of OB+BHs, while keeping the fraction of false-positives low. We find no OB+BH candidates in the ALS II among the DR3 orbits. This null-detection cannot be attributed to the underlying BH-formation scenario, but rather to the stringent DR3 selection criteria. To infer the BH-formation scenario with Gaia, we propose that the constraint on the relative parallax precision in DR4 should be 95% less conservative than the DR3 criterion.(Abridged)