论文标题
新兴的双极磁区域在太阳能循环的平均场发电机模型23和24中的影响
Effects of Emerging Bipolar Magnetic Regions in Mean-field Dynamo Model of Solar Cycles 23 and 24
论文作者
论文摘要
我们使用非线性动力学平均场功能模型(包括双极磁区域(BMR)的形成和演化)对太阳循环23和24的物理参数进行建模。 Parker Type Dynamo模型由平均场公式中的完整MHD系统组成:3D磁感应方程以及无弹性近似中的2D动量和能量方程。 BMR的初始化是在Parker磁性浮力不稳定性框架中建模的。它定义了BMR注射的深度,该深度通常位于全局发电机波的边缘。具有经度和纬度的分布以及初始BMR扰动的大小取自活动区域的NOAA数据库。扰动的倾斜度是通过随机函数建模的,平均倾斜度被建模为近表面螺旋(alpha-effect)项。将数据驱动的模型与针对初始扰动的随机纵向和纬度分布计算的模型进行了比较。将建模结果与太阳循环的各种观察到的特性进行了比较,包括磁性蝴蝶图,极性磁和基础磁通量以及BMR通量在表面上的概率分布。我们的结果表明,BMR可以在发电机过程中发挥重要作用,并影响太阳周期的强度。但是,数据驱动的模型表明,仅BMR效应不能解释弱周期24。弱周期和延长的磁性磁活性最小值可能是由于周期23的衰减阶段的大部分湍流螺旋性降低而引起的。
We model the physical parameters of Solar Cycles 23 and 24 using a nonlinear dynamical mean-field dynamo model that includes the formation and evolution of bipolar magnetic regions (BMR). The Parker-type dynamo model consists of a complete MHD system in the mean-field formulation: the 3D magnetic induction equation, and 2D momentum and energy equations in the anelastic approximation. The initialization of BMR is modeled in the framework of Parker's magnetic buoyancy instability. It defines the depths of BMR injections, which are typically located at the edge of the global dynamo waves. The distribution with longitude and latitude and the size of the initial BMR perturbations are taken from the NOAA database of active regions. The tilt of the perturbations is modeled by random function, and the mean tilt is modeled as a near-surface helicity (alpha-effect) term. The data-driven models are compared with the models calculated for random longitudinal and latitudinal distributions of the initial perturbation. The modeling results are compared with various observed characteristics of the solar cycles, including the magnetic butterfly diagram, the polar magnetic and basal magnetic fluxes, and the probability distributions of the BMR flux on the surface. Our results show that BMR can play a substantial role in the dynamo processes, and affect the strength of the solar cycle. However, the data-driven model shows that the BMR effect alone cannot explain the weak Cycle 24. This weak cycle and the prolonged preceding minimum of magnetic activity were probably caused by a decrease of the turbulent helicity in the bulk of the convection zone during the decaying phase of Cycle 23.