论文标题

评估两个独立方向依赖性校准算法对Lofar 21-CM信号功率谱的影响

Assessing the impact of two independent direction-dependent calibration algorithms on the LOFAR 21-cm signal power spectrum

论文作者

Gan, H., Mertens, F. G., Koopmans, L. V. E., Offringa, A. R., Mevius, M., Pandey, V. N., Brackenhoff, S. A., Ceccotti, E., Ciardi, B., Gehlot, B. K., Ghara, R., Giri, S. K., Iliev, I. T., Munshi, S.

论文摘要

由于强大的天体物理前景,电离层效应,射频干扰和仪器效应,检测到回报时期(EOR)的21 cm信号是具有挑战性的。理解和校准这些效果对于检测至关重要。在这项工作中,我们引入了新开发的方向依赖性(DD)校准算法Decal,并将其性能与现有算法Sagecal进行比较,在Lofar-Eor 21-CM功率谱实验的背景下。在我们的数据集中,同时观察到北天极(NCP)及其侧翼场。我们分析了NCP及其侧翼场之一。 NCP场是通过标准管道校准的,使用带有广泛的天空模型和122个方向的Sagecal校准,侧翼场由Ddecal和Sagecal校准,具有简单的天空模型和22个方向。此外,使用两种策略用于减去Cassiopeia a和CygnusA。结果表明,由于应用梁模型,DDECAL在减去主要光束区域的减去源时表现更好,而Sagecal在减去Cassiopeia a和Cygnus A时表现更好。在初级梁区域中,好处是显而易见的。我们还比较了两个不同字段上的21厘米功率谱。结果表明,与NCP相比,在此特定观察结果中,侧翼场会产生更好的上限。尽管由于梁的应用而引起的decal和sagecal之间的差异很小,但我们发现两种算法在前景后的Lofar-eor数据上产生了可比的21 cm功率谱。因此,当前的Lofar-Eor 21-CM功率谱限不太可能取决于DD校准方法。

Detecting the 21-cm signal from the Epoch of Reionisation (EoR) is challenging due to the strong astrophysical foregrounds, ionospheric effects, radio frequency interference and instrumental effects. Understanding and calibrating these effects are crucial for the detection. In this work, we introduce a newly developed direction-dependent (DD) calibration algorithm DDECAL and compare its performance with an existing algorithm, SAGECAL, in the context of the LOFAR-EoR 21-cm power spectrum experiment. In our data set, the North Celestial Pole (NCP) and its flanking fields were observed simultaneously. We analyse the NCP and one of its flanking fields. The NCP field is calibrated by the standard pipeline, using SAGECAL with an extensive sky model and 122 directions, and the flanking field is calibrated by DDECAL and SAGECAL with a simpler sky model and 22 directions. Additionally, two strategies are used for subtracting Cassiopeia A and Cygnus A. The results show that DDECAL performs better at subtracting sources in the primary beam region due to the application of a beam model, while SAGECAL performs better at subtracting Cassiopeia A and Cygnus A. This indicates that including a beam model during DD calibration significantly improves the performance. The benefit is obvious in the primary beam region. We also compare the 21-cm power spectra on two different fields. The results show that the flanking field produces better upper limits compared to the NCP in this particular observation. Despite the minor differences between DDECAL and SAGECAL due to the beam application, we find that the two algorithms yield comparable 21-cm power spectra on the LOFAR-EoR data after foreground removal. Hence, the current LOFAR-EoR 21-cm power spectrum limits are not likely to depend on the DD calibration method.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源