论文标题
使用博客使经同行评审的研究更容易访问
Using blogs to make peer-reviewed research more accessible
论文作者
论文摘要
基于学科的教育研究人员提供的知识旨在帮助讲师改善学生的学习和教育成果。然而,所产生的信息甚至可能无法触及其旨在影响的教育者。先前的工作发现,讲师经常面临在同行评审文献中实施实践的障碍。这些障碍中的一些与首先获得知识有关,例如难以找到和理解研究,并且缺乏时间。为了降低这些障碍,我们创建了一个在线博客Perbites,该博客总结了最新的基于学科的教育研究,该研究的简短帖子使用了简单的语言。迄今为止,我们进行了近100篇论文,我们进行了一项调查,以查看我们是否正在满足最初需要解决的需求。我们在我们的网站上发布了23项调查,并收到了24个可用响应。结果表明,读者通常同意我们实现了我们的原始目标。读者报告说,与典型的基于学科的教育研究(DBER)杂志文章相比,我们的文章更容易理解和使用更普通的语言。同时,读者认为所有重要信息仍然包括在内。最后,读者说,这种方法帮助他们跟上了DBER研究,并阅读了他们原本没有的论文。但是,大多数读者并未表明由于阅读我们的博客而改变了他们的教学和研究实践。我们的结果表明,共享研究的替代方法(例如,未得到审查的出版物或会议演讲)可能是将研究与从业人员联系起来的有效方法,并且未来的工作应考虑我们作为社区的我们如何以这些努力来确保教育研究可以在课堂上进行有意义的变化。
Discipline-based education researchers produce knowledge that aims to help instructors improve student learning and educational outcomes. Yet, the information produced may not even reach the educators it is intended to influence. Prior work has found that instructors often face barriers to implementing practices in peer-reviewed literature. Some of these barriers are related to accessing the knowledge in the first place such as difficulty finding and understanding research and a lack of time to do so. To lower these barriers, we created an online blog, PERbites, that summarizes recent discipline-based education research in short posts that use plain language. Having covered nearly 100 papers to date, we conducted a survey to see if we were addressing the need we had originally set out to address. We posted a 23-item survey on our website and received 24 usable responses. The results suggested that readers do generally agree that we are meeting our original goals. Readers reported that our articles were easier to understand and used more plain language than a typical discipline-based education research (DBER) journal article. At the same time, readers thought that all the important information was still included. Finally, readers said that this approach helped them keep up with DBER studies and read about papers they otherwise would not have. However, most readers did not indicate they changed their teaching and research practice as a result of reading our blog. Our results suggest that alternative methods of sharing research (e.g., non-peer reviewed publications or conference talks) can be an effective method of connecting research with practitioners, and future work should consider how we as a community might build on these efforts to ensure education research can make meaningful changes in the classroom.