论文标题
气候变化和天文学:查看Maunakea的长期趋势
Climate Change and Astronomy: A Look at Long-Term Trends on Maunakea
论文作者
论文摘要
Maunakea是世界上天文观测的主要遗址之一,多个望远镜在次毫米到光波长上运行。 Maunakea的山顶高于海拔4200米,是天文学的理想场所,其历史悠久,稳定的气候和最小的湍流在山顶上方。然而,在不断变化的气候下,我们询问自该站点首次被选为天文台所在地以来的(上)峰会条件可能是如何发展的,以及该站点可能继续进行更改的未来。我们使用来自一系列来源的数据,包括原位气象观测,辐射概况和数值重新分析,在过去的40年中在Maunakea建造气候学。我们对气象条件(例如风速和湿度)和图像质量(例如,看到)都感兴趣。我们发现,在此期间,气象条件通常是相对稳定的,几乎没有统计学意义的趋势,并且在天文学上重要的参数(例如温度和沉淀水蒸气)中,准周期性的年际变化。但是,我们确实发现,在过去的几十年中,最大风速有所提高,风速的频率高于15〜m〜s $^{ - 1} $的频率增加了1--2%,这可能会对地面层湍流产生重大影响。重要的是,我们发现在过去40年中,油炸参数没有变化,这表明在山顶上方的光湍流强度没有增加。最终,在网站上需要更多数据和数据源,包括仪器 - 确保继续监视未来并检测峰会气候的变化。
Maunakea is one of the world's primary sites for astronomical observing, with multiple telescopes operating over sub-millimeter to optical wavelengths. With its summit higher than 4200 meters above sea level, Maunakea is an ideal location for astronomy with an historically dry, stable climate and minimal turbulence above the summit. Under a changing climate, however, we ask how the (above-) summit conditions may have evolved in recent decades since the site was first selected as an observatory location, and how future-proof the site might be to continued change. We use data from a range of sources, including in-situ meteorological observations, radiosonde profiles, and numerical reanalyses to construct a climatology at Maunakea over the previous 40 years. We are interested in both the meteorological conditions (e.g., wind speed and humidity), and the image quality (e.g., seeing). We find that meteorological conditions were, in general, relatively stable over the period with few statistically significant trends and with quasi-cyclical inter-annual variability in astronomically significant parameters such as temperature and precipitable water vapour. We do, however, find that maximum wind speeds have increased over the past decades, with the frequency of wind speeds above 15~m~s$^{-1}$ increasing in frequency by 1--2%, which may have a significant impact on ground-layer turbulence. Importantly, we find that the Fried parameter has not changed in the last 40 years, suggesting there has not been an increase in optical turbulence strength above the summit. Ultimately, more data and data sources-including profiling instruments-are needed at the site to ensure continued monitoring into the future and to detect changes in the summit climate.