论文标题
湍流中的气泡粒子碰撞:点粒子模拟的见解
Bubble-particle collisions in turbulence: insights from point-particle simulations
论文作者
论文摘要
湍流中的气泡粒子碰撞是多种过程(例如泡沫浮选)的核心。尽管它们的重要性,但碰撞过程的细节尚未得到太多关注。气泡和颗粒在湍流中的有时反直觉行为使它更加复杂,这是因为它们在太空中隔离的事实所示。尽管气泡粒子的相对行为与相同颗粒的相对行为根本不同,但现有的理论模型几乎是湍流中粒子粒子碰撞的理论的所有扩展。迄今为止,这些理论的充分性尚未作为适当的数据进行评估。在这项研究中,我们通过使用点部分方法在一系列相关参数(包括Stokes and Reynolds数字)的范围内使用点粒子方法来研究均质各向同性湍流中气泡粒子碰撞的直接数值模拟的几何碰撞速率。我们分析了气泡和颗粒的空间分布,并量化它们的隔离在多大程度上降低了碰撞速率。与单分散对相比,气泡粒子的方法速度增加来抵消这种效果,这与我们有关气泡和颗粒对流体加速度响应的差异的差异。我们发现,在调查的参数范围内,这些碰撞统计数据不会通过包含升力或不同的拖动参数或假设无限粒子密度来显着改变。此外,我们批判性地检查了现有模型,并讨论了有助于差异的不一致之处。
Bubble-particle collisions in turbulence are central to a variety of processes such as froth flotation. Despite their importance, details of the collision process have not received much attention yet. This is compounded by the sometimes counter-intuitive behaviour of bubbles and particles in turbulence, as exemplified by the fact that they segregate in space. Although bubble-particle relative behaviour is fundamentally different from that of identical particles, the existing theoretical models are nearly all extensions of theories for particle-particle collisions in turbulence. The adequacy of these theories has yet to be assessed as appropriate data remain scarce to date. In this investigation, we study the geometric collision rate by means of direct numerical simulations of bubble-particle collisions in homogeneous isotropic turbulence using the point-particle approach over a range of the relevant parameters, including the Stokes and Reynolds numbers. We analyse the spatial distribution of bubble and particles, and quantify to what extent their segregation reduces the collision rate. This effect is countered by increased approach velocities for bubble-particle compared to monodisperse pairs, which we relate to the difference in how bubbles and particles respond to fluid accelerations. We found that in the investigated parameter range, these collision statistics are not altered significantly by the inclusion of a lift force or different drag parametrisations, or when assuming infinite particle density. Furthermore, we critically examine existing models and discuss inconsistencies therein that contribute to the discrepancy.