论文标题
纤曲纹和滑动触觉触觉反馈设备的性能分析姿势调整
Performance Analysis of Vibrotactile and Slide-and-Squeeze Haptic Feedback Devices for Limbs Postural Adjustment
论文作者
论文摘要
反复或持续的尴尬身体姿势是与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病(MSDS)发展最常见的危险因素之一。为了防止工人采用有害配置,同时也指导他们采用更符合人体工程学的配置,可穿戴的触觉设备可能是理想的解决方案。在本文中,在肢体姿势校正环境中评估了一个称为麦戈塔克的颤振单元,称为袖口和称为袖口的滑动单元。使用定量与任务相关的指标和主观定量评估,比较了在十二个健康受试者中比较十二名健康受试者中提供单关节(肩膀或膝盖)和多关节(肩膀和膝盖)指导的能力。还建立了一个集成的环境,以简化所涉及的传感器和反馈系统之间的沟通和数据共享。结果显示出两种设备的良好可接受性和直觉。 Ergotac似乎是肩膀的合适反馈装置,而袖口可能是膝盖的有效解决方案。这项比较研究虽然是初步的,但它是对两种设备进行有效的全身姿势校正的潜在整合的建议,目的是开发反馈和辅助设备,以提高工人对危险工作条件的认识,从而防止MSD。
Recurrent or sustained awkward body postures are among the most frequently cited risk factors to the development of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). To prevent workers from adopting harmful configurations but also to guide them toward more ergonomic ones, wearable haptic devices may be the ideal solution. In this paper, a vibrotactile unit, called ErgoTac, and a slide-and-squeeze unit, called CUFF, were evaluated in a limbs postural correction setting. Their capability of providing single-joint (shoulder or knee) and multi-joint (shoulder and knee at once) guidance was compared in twelve healthy subjects, using quantitative task-related metrics and subjective quantitative evaluation. An integrated environment was also built to ease communication and data sharing between the involved sensor and feedback systems. Results show good acceptability and intuitiveness for both devices. ErgoTac appeared as the suitable feedback device for the shoulder, while the CUFF may be the effective solution for the knee. This comparative study, although preliminary, was propaedeutic to the potential integration of the two devices for effective whole-body postural corrections, with the aim to develop a feedback and assistive apparatus to increase workers' awareness about risky working conditions and therefore to prevent MSDs.