论文标题
拓扑孤子的量子成核
Quantum nucleation of topological solitons
论文作者
论文摘要
手性孤子晶格是一系列拓扑孤子,在强磁场或快速旋转下以有限密度为QCD的基础状态,并具有易于平面各向异性的手性磁铁。在这种情况下,拓扑孤子由于拓扑术语而产生负能量,该拓扑词分别来自手性磁或涡旋效应和dzyaloshinskii-Moriya的相互作用。我们通过使用复杂的$ ϕ^4 $(或Axion)模型,通过与外部磁场成比例的拓扑术语来研究真空中拓扑孤子的量子成核通过$ 2+1 $和$ 3+1 $的尺寸,这是简化上述系统的低增强理论的模型。在$ 2+1 $的尺寸中,一对涡流和反涡流由线性孤子连接,而在$ 3+1 $的尺寸中,涡流是弦乐的,孤子状的圆柱状,孤子壁的磁盘是由绳子行回路的。由于由于拓扑术语,孤子的张力可能有效地为负,因此通过量子隧道来产生有限大小的复合构型,然后迅速增长。我们在薄缺陷近似中分析估计成核概率,并使用弛豫(梯度流)方法对其进行数值计算。当孤子的方向垂直于外场时,成核概率最大化。如果我们从数字中读取涡旋张力,而在$ 2+1 $尺寸中,我们发现薄段近似值和直接数值模拟之间的良好协议,而在短距离处它们之间的差异为$ 3+1 $尺寸的短距离。
The chiral soliton lattice is an array of topological solitons realized as ground states of QCD at finite density under strong magnetic fields or rapid rotation, and chiral magnets with an easy-plane anisotropy. In such cases, topological solitons have negative energy due to topological terms originating from the chiral magnetic or vortical effect and the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction, respectively. We study quantum nucleation of topological solitons in the vacuum through quantum tunneling in $2+1$ and $3+1$ dimensions, by using a complex $ϕ^4$ (or the axion) model with a topological term proportional to an external field, which is a simplification of low-energy theories of the above systems. In $2+1$ dimensions, a pair of a vortex and an anti-vortex is connected by a linear soliton, while in $3+1$ dimensions, a vortex is string-like, a soliton is wall-like, and a disk of a soliton wall is bounded by a string loop. Since the tension of solitons can be effectively negative due to the topological term, such a composite configuration of a finite size is created by quantum tunneling and subsequently grows rapidly. We estimate the nucleation probability analytically in the thin-defect approximation and fully calculate it numerically using the relaxation (gradient flow) method. The nucleation probability is maximized when the direction of the soliton is perpendicular to the external field. We find a good agreement between the thin-defect approximation and direct numerical simulation in $2+1$ dimensions if we read the vortex tension from the numerics, while we find a difference between them at short distances interpreted as a remnant energy in $3+1$ dimensions.