论文标题
基于AI的计算机辅助诊断系统的胸部数字层析成像综合系统:基于X射线的AI系统证明比较优势
AI-based computer-aided diagnostic system of chest digital tomography synthesis: Demonstrating comparative advantage with X-ray-based AI systems
论文作者
论文摘要
与胸部X射线(CXR)成像相比,它是从患者正面投射的单个图像,胸部数字性层合成(CDTS)成像对于肺部病变检测可能更有利,因为它从患者的多个角度获取了多个图像。据报道,各种临床比较分析和验证研究证明了这一点,但是没有基于人工智能(AI)的比较分析研究。现有的用于肺部病变诊断的基于AI的计算机辅助检测系统主要是基于CXR图像开发的。然而,与基于CXR的同类产品相比,尚未提出和验证基于CDT的CAD(基于CDT的CAD)。这项研究开发/测试基于CDTS的AI CAD系统,以检测肺部病变,以证明与基于CXR的AI CAD相比,该系统可证明性能的改善。我们使用多个投影图像作为基于CDTS的AI模型的输入和单个投影图像作为基于CXR的AI模型的输入,以公平地比较和评估模型之间的性能。拟议的基于CDT的AI CAD系统的灵敏度为0.782和0.785,精度为0.895和0.837,用于检测针对正常受试者的结核病和肺炎。这些结果表明,通过基于CXR的AI CAD检测结核病和肺炎的敏感性高于0.728和0.698,精度为0.874和0.826,仅在额叶方向上使用单个投影图像。我们发现,与基于CXR的AI CAD相比,基于CDTS的AI CAD分别提高了结核和肺炎的敏感性,分别提高了5.4%和8.7%。因此,我们相对证明,基于CDTS的AI CAD技术比CXR可以提高性能,从而提高了CDT的临床适用性。
Compared with chest X-ray (CXR) imaging, which is a single image projected from the front of the patient, chest digital tomosynthesis (CDTS) imaging can be more advantageous for lung lesion detection because it acquires multiple images projected from multiple angles of the patient. Various clinical comparative analysis and verification studies have been reported to demonstrate this, but there were no artificial intelligence (AI)-based comparative analysis studies. Existing AI-based computer-aided detection (CAD) systems for lung lesion diagnosis have been developed mainly based on CXR images; however, CAD-based on CDTS, which uses multi-angle images of patients in various directions, has not been proposed and verified for its usefulness compared to CXR-based counterparts. This study develops/tests a CDTS-based AI CAD system to detect lung lesions to demonstrate performance improvements compared to CXR-based AI CAD. We used multiple projection images as input for the CDTS-based AI model and a single-projection image as input for the CXR-based AI model to fairly compare and evaluate the performance between models. The proposed CDTS-based AI CAD system yielded sensitivities of 0.782 and 0.785 and accuracies of 0.895 and 0.837 for the performance of detecting tuberculosis and pneumonia, respectively, against normal subjects. These results show higher performance than sensitivities of 0.728 and 0.698 and accuracies of 0.874 and 0.826 for detecting tuberculosis and pneumonia through the CXR-based AI CAD, which only uses a single projection image in the frontal direction. We found that CDTS-based AI CAD improved the sensitivity of tuberculosis and pneumonia by 5.4% and 8.7% respectively, compared to CXR-based AI CAD without loss of accuracy. Therefore, we comparatively prove that CDTS-based AI CAD technology can improve performance more than CXR, enhancing the clinical applicability of CDTS.