论文标题
在线协调:美国四个事件的协调组的方法和比较案例研究
Online Coordination: Methods and Comparative Case Studies of Coordinated Groups across Four Events in the United States
论文作者
论文摘要
在线社交媒体上合作的用户帐户的协调组可用于操纵在线话语,因此是一个重要的研究领域。在这项研究中,我们致力于一般的协调理论。有很多方法可以在线协调组:语义,社交,推荐等。每个都代表一个协调维度,其中一个事件的协调尺寸越多,协调越强。我们基于现有方法,通过在指定的时间窗口内识别高水平的同步操作来检测协调组。这种方法的关键问题是选择时间窗口。我们提出了一种选择最佳窗口大小以准确捕获本地协调的方法,同时避免捕获重合同步性。通过这种增强的协调检测方法,我们在四个事件中进行了一项比较研究:美国选举2020,重新开放2020年,2020年,国会大厦2021年和Covid疫苗释放2021年。在此处,我们探索了每个事件的协调三维 - 语义,参考,参考和社会协调 - 以及在境内进行组合和事件,并在内部进行组合和事件。这使我们能够揭示不同的用户协调行为模式,并确定叙述和用户支持主题,从而估算协调的程度和主题。
Coordinated groups of user accounts working together in online social media can be used to manipulate the online discourse and thus is an important area of study. In this study, we work towards a general theory of coordination. There are many ways to coordinate groups online: semantic, social, referral and many more. Each represents a coordination dimension, where the more dimensions of coordination are present for one event, the stronger the coordination present. We build on existing approaches that detect coordinated groups by identifying high levels of synchronized actions within a specified time window. A key concern with this approach is the selection of the time window. We propose a method that selects the optimal window size to accurately capture local coordination while avoiding the capture of coincidental synchronicity. With this enhanced method of coordination detection, we perform a comparative study across four events: US Elections Primaries 2020, Reopen America 2020, Capitol Riots 2021 and COVID Vaccine Release 2021. Herein, we explore the following three dimensions of coordination for each event -- semantic, referral and social coordination -- and perform group and user analysis within and among the events. This allows us to expose different user coordination behavior patterns and identify narratives and user support themes, hence estimating the degree and theme of coordination.