论文标题

测量和减轻投票访问差异:佛罗里达州和北卡罗来纳州种族和投票地点的研究

Measuring and mitigating voting access disparities: a study of race and polling locations in Florida and North Carolina

论文作者

Abbasi, Mohsen, Venkatasubramanian, Suresh, Friedler, Sorelle A., Lum, Kristian, Barrett, Calvin

论文摘要

在美国,镇压选民的抑制和相关的种族差异是美国长期以来的民权问题。在过去的几十年中,投票的障碍已经采取了许多形式。暴力明确灰心的历史已转变为更微妙的访问限制,其中可能包括长队和等待时间,长途旅行时间到达投票站以及其他投票的后勤障碍。我们在这项工作上的重点是量化与整体投票有关的投票访问方面的差异,以及如何通过更好的投票地点选择或提供更多选民可以投票的网站来纠正它们。但是,由于需要考虑人口密度和对合理旅行时间的不同社区期望等因素,因此很难适当校准访问差异。 在本文中,我们量化了对投票地点的访问,开发了一种方法,用于校准投票位置中种族差异的测量“负载”和与投票地点的距离。我们将此方法应用于佛罗里达州和北卡罗来纳州的现实世界数据的研究,以确定2020年选举的投票差异。我们还介绍了算法,并进行了修改以处理规模,可以通过建议从给定的已确定公共位置清单(包括学校和图书馆)提出新的投票地点来减少这些差异。在2020年选举地点数据上应用这些算法也有助于公开和探索分配更多的投票地点成本与对访问差异的潜在影响之间的权衡。开发的投票访问测量方法和算法补救技术是更好的轮询位置分配的第一步。

Voter suppression and associated racial disparities in access to voting are long-standing civil rights concerns in the United States. Barriers to voting have taken many forms over the decades. A history of violent explicit discouragement has shifted to more subtle access limitations that can include long lines and wait times, long travel times to reach a polling station, and other logistical barriers to voting. Our focus in this work is on quantifying disparities in voting access pertaining to the overall time-to-vote, and how they could be remedied via a better choice of polling location or provisioning more sites where voters can cast ballots. However, appropriately calibrating access disparities is difficult because of the need to account for factors such as population density and different community expectations for reasonable travel times. In this paper, we quantify access to polling locations, developing a methodology for the calibrated measurement of racial disparities in polling location "load" and distance to polling locations. We apply this methodology to a study of real-world data from Florida and North Carolina to identify disparities in voting access from the 2020 election. We also introduce algorithms, with modifications to handle scale, that can reduce these disparities by suggesting new polling locations from a given list of identified public locations (including schools and libraries). Applying these algorithms on the 2020 election location data also helps to expose and explore tradeoffs between the cost of allocating more polling locations and the potential impact on access disparities. The developed voting access measurement methodology and algorithmic remediation technique is a first step in better polling location assignment.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源