论文标题

随机气候模型 - 一种校准气候扩展风险模型(CERS)的方法

A Stochastic Climate Model -- An approach to calibrate the Climate-Extended Risk Model (CERM)

论文作者

Gaudemet, Jean-Baptiste, Deschamps, Jules, Vinciguerra, Olivier

论文摘要

最初与气候扩展的风险模型(CERM)通过巴塞尔II IRB模型的气候扩展,解决了银行贷款组合中嵌入与气候相关的金融风险的估计。它使用使用非固定宏观相关校准的高斯副群模型,以反映与气候相关的金融风险的未来演变。在这篇互补文章中,我们提出了一种随机前瞻性方法,以从科学气候数据中校准气候宏观相关的演变,以专门针对物理和过渡工作。我们假设全球身体和过渡风险被大气中的持续的温室气体(GHG)浓度比作。经济风险被认为是静止的,因此可以通过落后的方法进行校准。我们提出了对GDP建模的4个关键原则,并建议通过三个相互依存的随机过程对经济,物理和过渡工作因素进行建模,以允许使用七个定义明确的参数进行校准。这些参数可以使用公共数据进行校准。这种新方法不仅意味着在不选择任何特定方案的情况下评估气候风险,而且还可以通过设计一个框架来评估过渡路径的每个步骤(通常每年)的信用损失,从而填补当前一年的监管和经济资本模型方法之间的差距,以及对气候风险的长期观点。这种新方法可以证明在2022年中央银行的背景下,权衡气候资本费用的利弊。

The initial Climate-Extended Risk Model (CERM) addresses the estimate of climate-related financial risk embedded within a bank loan portfolio, through a climatic extension of the Basel II IRB model. It uses a Gaussian copula model calibrated with non stationary macro-correlations in order to reflect the future evolution of climate-related financial risks. In this complementary article, we propose a stochastic forward-looking methodology to calibrate climate macro-correlation evolution from scientific climate data, for physical and transition efforts specifically. We assume a global physical and transition risk, likened to persistent greenhouse gas (GHG) concentration in the atmosphere. The economic risk is considered stationary and can therefore be calibrated with a backward-looking methodology. We present 4 key principles to model the GDP and we propose to model the economic, physical and transition effort factors with three interdependent stochastic processes allowing for a calibration with seven well defined parameters. These parameters can be calibrated using public data. This new approach means not only to evaluate climate risks without picking any specific scenario but also allows to fill the gap between current one year approach of regulatory and economic capital models and the necessarily long-term view of climate risks by designing a framework to evaluate the resulting credit loss on each step (typically yearly) of the transition path. This new approach could prove instrumental in the 2022 context of central banks weighing the pros and cons of a climate capital charge.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源