论文标题
评论：在线性三重量子点中使用空中介质的superexchange的通用控制
A comment on: Universal control of superexchange in linear triple quantum dots with an empty mediator
论文作者
论文摘要
在最近的预印度ARXIV中：2203.15521 G. X. Chan，P。Huang和X. Wang声称，在A（1、0、1）电荷配置中，三重量子点superexchange表现出符号的变化（从正变为负），因为中间点引人入胜的功能。此外，他们的说法是，对于互隔间的特定值而存在电荷甜点。他们的分析基于Hubbard模型，以及它们所谓的完整配置相互作用方法。所有这些发现已经由Ref。物理。 Rev. B 96，201304（R）（2017）基于Hubbard模型。参考文献中没有提到此手稿。 ARXIV：2203.15521。我已经要求作者紧急修改预印刷品并将其工作定位在先前进行的研究方面 - 他们拒绝当前的时刻，引用该pp。在接受之前修改预印本不是他们的风格。这与某些人物非常相似的风格同时，我的结论是，他们故意误导了科学界，并试图将其他人的工作和思想作为自己的工作。
In a recent preprint arXiv:2203.15521 G. X. Chan, P. Huang, and X. Wang claim that triple-quantum dot superexchange in a (1, 0, 1) charge configuration exhibits a change of sign (going from positive to negative) as a function of middle dot detuning. Furthermore, their claim is that charge sweet-spots exist for specific values of the inter-dot detuning. Their analysis is based on the Hubbard model and something to what they refer to as the full Configuration-Interaction method. All of this findings were already reported by M. J. Rančić and G. Burkard in Ref. Phys. Rev. B 96, 201304(R) (2017) based on the Hubbard model. No reference to this manuscript was made in Ref. arXiv:2203.15521. I have asked the authors to urgently modify the pre-print and position their work with respect to the previously conducted study - which they rejected to do at the current moment, quoting that pp. it is not their style to modify preprints before they were accepted. This alongside with a very similar style of some figures lead me to the conclusion that they are deliberately misleading the scientific community and trying to adopt other peoples work and ideas as their own.
