论文标题
扩展现实中基于注意的应用程序以支持自闭症用户:系统评价
Attention-Based Applications in Extended Reality to Support Autistic Users: A Systematic Review
论文作者
论文摘要
随着自闭症诊断的不断增长,研究必须了解如何利用技术来支持自闭症特征的多样性。尽管传统干预措施集中在医疗治疗和康复技术方面,但最近的研究旨在了解技术如何以有效而引人入胜的方式适应每种独特情况。鉴于与其他传统媒介相比,扩展现实(XR)技术在自闭症用户的注意力方面有效地提高了注意力。在这里,我们对59篇研究文章进行了系统的综述,探讨了对自闭症用户XR干预措施的作用。我们系统地分析了人口统计,研究设计和发现,包括自闭症筛查和注意力测量方法。此外,鉴于文献中的方法论上不一致,我们系统地合成了方法和协议,包括筛选工具,自闭症和XR任务的生理和行为线索。尽管有大量证据表明,在基于注意力的干预措施中使用XR来支持自闭症特征的有效性,但我们已经确定了三个主要的研究差距,这些差距提供了有希望的研究方向,以研究自闭症种群如何与XR相互作用。首先,我们的发现突出了自闭症研究的地理位置不成比例的地理位置,自闭症成年人的占代表性不足,性别差异的证据以及在研究中诊断出患有同时发生条件的个体的存在。其次,许多研究使用了各种标准化和新颖的任务和自我报告评估,测试可靠性有限。最后,该研究缺乏绩效维持和可转让性的证据。
With the rising prevalence of autism diagnoses, it is essential for research to understand how to leverage technology to support the diverse nature of autistic traits. While traditional interventions focused on technology for medical cure and rehabilitation, recent research aims to understand how technology can accommodate each unique situation in an efficient and engaging way. Extended reality (XR) technology has been shown to be effective in improving attention in autistic users given that it is more engaging and motivating than other traditional mediums. Here, we conducted a systematic review of 59 research articles that explored the role of attention in XR interventions for autistic users. We systematically analyzed demographics, study design and findings, including autism screening and attention measurement methods. Furthermore, given methodological inconsistencies in the literature, we systematically synthesize methods and protocols including screening tools, physiological and behavioral cues of autism and XR tasks. While there is substantial evidence for the effectiveness of using XR in attention-based interventions for autism to support autistic traits, we have identified three principal research gaps that provide promising research directions to examine how autistic populations interact with XR. First, our findings highlight the disproportionate geographic locations of autism studies and underrepresentation of autistic adults, evidence of gender disparity, and presence of individuals diagnosed with co-occurring conditions across studies. Second, many studies used an assortment of standardized and novel tasks and self-report assessments with limited tested reliability. Lastly, the research lacks evidence of performance maintenance and transferability.