论文标题

重新访问开普勒过境系统:揭开行星和相曲线中谐波之间的关系

Revisiting Kepler Transiting Systems: Unvetting Planets and Constraining Relationships among Harmonics in Phase Curves

论文作者

Niraula, Prajwal, Shporer, Avi, Wong, Ian, de Wit, Julien

论文摘要

基于空间的光度任务广泛使用统计验证工具来审查过渡行星候选者,尤其是在其他传统的行星确认方法不可行的情况下。在本文中,我们驳斥了三个先前验证的行星的行星性质-Kepler-854〜B,Kepler-840〜B和Kepler-699〜B-以及可能是第四个Kepler-747〜B,使用来自GAIA和相位曲线分析的更新的Stellar参数。在所有四种情况下,鉴于同伴所获得的恒星辐射,被推断的物理半径排除了其行星性质。对于Kepler-854〜B,源自宿主星的椭圆形变化的质量,该变化不是原始审查过程的一部分,同样指向非行星值。为了使我们对恒星群体伴侣的相位曲线的理解进行背景,并扩展了我们对高阶谐波的理解,我们检查了开普勒剥落的二进制文件,周期为1.5至10天。使用20个系统的样品,我们报告了相曲线信号的第二个余弦谐波与较高余弦谐波之间的强大关系,这支持了这些信号是由二进制组件之间的潮汐相互作用引起的。我们发现,第二和第三谐振幅之间的比率为$ 2.24 \ pm 0.48 $,与椭圆形失真的经典形式主义的预期价值为2.4。

Space-based photometric missions widely use statistical validation tools for vetting transiting planetary candidates, particularly when other traditional methods of planet confirmation are unviable. In this paper, we refute the planetary nature of three previously validated planets -- Kepler-854~b, Kepler-840~b, and Kepler-699~b -- and possibly a fourth, Kepler-747~b, using updated stellar parameters from Gaia and phase-curve analysis. In all four cases, the inferred physical radii rule out their planetary nature given the stellar radiation the companions receive. For Kepler-854~b, the mass derived from the host star's ellipsoidal variation, which had not been part of the original vetting procedure, similarly points to a non-planetary value. To contextualize our understanding of the phase curve for stellar mass companions in particular and extend our understanding of high-order harmonics, we examine Kepler eclipsing binaries with periods between 1.5 and 10 days. Using a sample of 20 systems, we report a strong power-law relation between the second cosine harmonic of the phase-curve signal and the higher cosine harmonics, which supports the hypothesis that those signals arise from the tidal interaction between the binary components. We find that the ratio between the second and third-harmonic amplitudes is $2.24 \pm 0.48$, in good agreement with the expected value of 2.4 from the classical formalism for the ellipsoidal distortion.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源