论文标题

传输模型比较中等能源重型离子碰撞的研究

Transport Model Comparison Studies of Intermediate-Energy Heavy-Ion Collisions

论文作者

Wolter, Hermann, Colonna, Maria, Cozma, Dan, Danielewicz, Pawel, Ko, Che Ming, Kumar, Rohit, Ono, Akira, Tsang, ManYee Betty, Xu, Jun, Zhang, Ying-Xun, Bratkovskaya, Elena, Feng, Zhao-Qing, Gaitanos, Theodoros, Fèvre, Arnaud Le, Ikeno, Natsumi, Kim, Youngman, Mallik, Swagata, Napolitani, Paolo, Oliinychenko, Dmytro, Ogawa, Tatsuhiko, Papa, Massimo, Su, Jun, Wang, Rui, Wang, Yong-Jia, Weil, Janus, Zhang, Feng-Shou, Zhang, Guo-Qiang, Zhang, Zhen, Aichelin, Joerg, Cassing, Wolfgang, Chen, Lie-Wen, Cheng, Hui-Gan, Elfner, Hannah, Gallmeister, K., Hartnack, Christoph, Hashimoto, Shintaro, Jeon, Sangyong, Kim, Kyungil, Kim, Myungkuk, Li, Bao-An, Lee, Chang-Hwan, Li, Qing-Feng, Li, Zhu-Xia, Mosel, Ulrich, Nara, Yasushi, Niita, Koji, Ohnishi, Akira, Sato, Tatsuhiko, Song, Taesoo, Sorensen, Agnieszka, Wang, Ning, Xie, Wen-Jie

论文摘要

传输模型是从低到相对论 - 能源重型离子碰撞获得物理信息的主要方法。已追求运输模型评估项目(TMEP),以测试传输模型预测的鲁棒性,从而从相同类型的物理模型得出一致的结论。通过各种参与代码进行了物理输入和设置的受控条件下的计算。其中包括在具有周期性边界条件的盒子中对核物质的计算,以及对重离子碰撞的更现实的计算。在此中级审查中,我们总结并讨论了该项目的现状。我们还提供了26个参与代码的凝结描述,这有助于该项目的某些部分。这些包括当今使用的主要代码。我们回顾了迄今为止完成的研究的主要结果。他们表明,在框计算中,可以很好地理解代码之间的差异,并且可以达到结果的融合。这些研究还强调了两个传输代码家族(称为BUU和QMD型代码)之间的系统差异。但是,当使用不同的物理模型在全面的重离子碰撞中比较这些代码时,对于最近的PION产生,它们仍然产生了实质上不同的结果。这要求将重型离子碰撞与受控模型和重要成分的盒子比较(例如动量依赖性领域)进行进一步比较。我们经常指出进行运输模拟的改进策略,从而为代码开发人员提供指导。如果可以根据基准计算(例如本综述中的总结)验证该代码的重型离子碰撞的运输模拟结果将具有更大的意义。

Transport models are the main method to obtain physics information from low to relativistic-energy heavy-ion collisions. The Transport Model Evaluation Project (TMEP) has been pursued to test the robustness of transport model predictions in reaching consistent conclusions from the same type of physical model. Calculations under controlled conditions of physical input and set-up were performed with various participating codes. These included both calculations of nuclear matter in a box with periodic boundary conditions, and more realistic calculations of heavy-ion collisions. In this intermediate review, we summarize and discuss the present status of the project. We also provide condensed descriptions of the 26 participating codes, which contributed to some part of the project. These include the major codes in use today. We review the main results of the studies completed so far. They show, that in box calculations the differences between the codes can be well understood and a convergence of the results can be reached. These studies also highlight the systematic differences between the two families of transport codes, known as BUU and QMD type codes. However, when the codes were compared in full heavy-ion collisions using different physical models, as recently for pion production, they still yielded substantially different results. This calls for further comparisons of heavy-ion collisions with controlled models and of box comparisons of important ingredients, like momentum-dependent fields, which are currently underway. We often indicate improved strategies in performing transport simulations and thus provide guidance to code developers. Results of transport simulations of heavy-ion collisions from a given code will have more significance if the code can be validated against benchmark calculations such as the ones summarized in this review.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源