论文标题
在NFT市场发现异常交易:NBA Topshot的情况
Spotting Anomalous Trades in NFT Markets: The Case of NBA Topshot
论文作者
论文摘要
毫无疑问的代币(NFT)市场是当今增长最快的数字市场之一,在2021年的第三季度销售额超过100亿美元!然而,这些新兴市场(类似于传统新兴市场)可以看作是非法活动的绝佳机会(例如,洗钱,非法商品的销售等)。在这项研究中,我们专注于一个特定的市场,即NBA Topshot,该市场有助于购买和(点对上)体育收藏品的交易。我们的目标是建立一个能够将平台上的点对点交易标记为异常的框架。为了实现我们的目标,我们首先要通过在平台上出售特定的收藏品来建立一个模型来实现利润。然后,我们使用RFCDE(用于因变量的条件密度的随机森林模型)来对利润模型的错误进行建模。此步骤使我们能够估计事务异常的可能性。我们最终将上述概率小于1%的任何交易标记为异常。鉴于缺乏根据交易的分类来评估模型的地面真相,我们分析了这些异常交易形成的贸易网络,并将其与平台的完整贸易网络进行比较。我们的结果表明,这两个网络在网络指标上是统计上不同的,例如边缘密度,闭合,节点中心性和节点学位分布。该网络分析提供了其他证据,表明这些交易不遵循与平台上其余交易相同的模式。但是,我们想在这里强调,这并不意味着这些交易也是非法的。这些交易将需要从适当的实体进行进一步审核,以验证它们是否是非法的。
Non-Fungible Token (NFT) markets are one of the fastest growing digital markets today, with the sales during the third quarter of 2021 exceeding $10 billions! Nevertheless, these emerging markets - similar to traditional emerging marketplaces - can be seen as a great opportunity for illegal activities (e.g., money laundering, sale of illegal goods etc.). In this study we focus on a specific marketplace, namely NBA TopShot, that facilitates the purchase and (peer-to-peer) trading of sports collectibles. Our objective is to build a framework that is able to label peer-to-peer transactions on the platform as anomalous or not. To achieve our objective we begin by building a model for the profit to be made by selling a specific collectible on the platform. We then use RFCDE - a random forest model for the conditional density of the dependent variable - to model the errors from the profit models. This step allows us to estimate the probability of a transaction being anomalous. We finally label as anomalous any transaction whose aforementioned probability is less than 1%. Given the absence of ground truth for evaluating the model in terms of its classification of transactions, we analyze the trade networks formed from these anomalous transactions and compare it with the full trade network of the platform. Our results indicate that these two networks are statistically different when it comes to network metrics such as, edge density, closure, node centrality and node degree distribution. This network analysis provides additional evidence that these transactions do not follow the same patterns that the rest of the trades on the platform follow. However, we would like to emphasize here that this does not mean that these transactions are also illegal. These transactions will need to be further audited from the appropriate entities to verify whether or not they are illicit.