论文标题
用2 <z <3 lyman- $α$ forest限制大黄花加热
Constraining blazar heating with the 2<z<3 Lyman-$α$ forest
论文作者
论文摘要
播层间培养基(IGM)的作用像是通过宇宙结构形成,恒星和活性银河系核的光热的量热计记录能量注射。最近有人提出,空间不均匀的tev-blazars可能会大大加热不足的IgM,从而在$ z \ simeq2-3 $左右的冷和温暖的IgM斑块中产生斑块。这项研究的目的是将不同Blazar加热模型的预测与IGM的最新观察结果进行比较。我们进行了一组宇宙学模拟,并仔细计算Lyman $α($ ly $ ly $α$)森林的模拟观察物。我们对不同的系统不确定性进行详细评估,这些评估通常会影响这种可观察到的物品,并发现它们小于模型之间的差异。我们发现,我们的不均匀的Blazar加热模型与Ly $α$线的属性和在高红移处的重新升级概率分布函数非常吻合($ 2.5 <z <3 $),但是我们的Blazar加热模型受到较低的红移数据的挑战($ 2 <z <z <2.5 $)。我们的结果可以通过HEII的回报来解释,尽管最先进的模型在为低密度IgM提供足够的加热方面缺乏,从而激发了对不均匀HEII的进一步辐射转移研究。如果确实是由$ 2 \ times10^{13} {M} _ \ odot $的集体质量光环托管的,那么与以前的型号相比,随后的Blazar供暖起来将受到青睐,这可能会使我们的发现与本地γ-射线播放的Blazar加热的证据一致。
The intergalactic medium (IGM) acts like a calorimeter recording energy injection by cosmic structure formation, shocks and photoheating from stars and active galactic nuclei. It was recently proposed that spatially inhomogeneous TeV-blazars could significantly heat up the underdense IGM, resulting in patches of both cold and warm IGM around $z\simeq2-3$. The goal of this study is to compare predictions of different blazar heating models with recent observations of the IGM. We perform a set of cosmological simulations and carefully compute mock observables of the Lyman-$α ($Ly$α$) forest. We perform a detailed assessment of different systematic uncertainties which typically impact this type of observables and find that they are smaller than the differences between our models. We find that our inhomogeneous blazar heating model is in good agreement with the Ly$α$ line properties and the rescaled flux probability distribution function at high redshift ($2.5<z<3$) but that our blazar heating models are challenged by lower redshift data ($2<z<2.5$). Our results could be explained by HeII reionisation although state-of-the-art models fall short on providing enough heating to the low-density IGM, thus motivating further radiative transfer studies of inhomogeneous HeII reionisation. If blazars are indeed hosted by group-mass halos of $2\times10^{13}{M}_\odot$, a later onset of blazar heating in comparison to previous models would be favoured, which could bring our findings here in agreement with the evidence of blazar heating from local gamma-ray observations.