论文标题
评论“ $ d = 2 $和$ d = 3 $的随机关闭包装的显式分析解决方案”
Comment on "Explicit Analytical Solution for Random Close Packing in $d=2$ and $d=3$"
论文作者
论文摘要
在此简短的评论中，我们对文章提供了“ $ d = 2 $和$ d = 3 $的随机关闭包装的明确分析解决方案”，其后续勘误最近发表在物理评论信中。在该信中，作者在$ d = 2 $ and $ d = 3 $中提出了音量分数的明确分析推导$ ϕ _ {\ rm rm rcp} $。在这里，我们首先简要显示参考文献{za22}的衍生物的关键部分，然后提供有关为什么我们认为分析结果的推导是有问题且不合理的，以及为什么我们以前提出的问题是有问题的，也没有解决问题。
In this short commentary we provide our comment on the article "Explicit Analytical Solution for Random Close Packing in $d=2$ and $d=3$" and its subsequent Erratum that are recently published in Physical Review Letters. In that Letter, the author presented an explicit analytical derivation of the volume fractions $ϕ_{\rm RCP}$ for random close packings (RCP) in both $d=2$ and $d=3$. Here we first briefly show the key parts of the derivation in Ref.~\cite{Za22}, and then provide arguments on why we think the derivation of the analytical results is problematic and unjustified, and why the Erratum does not address or clarify the concerns raised previously by us.
