论文标题
类比，思想和生活
Analogy, Mind, and Life
论文作者
论文摘要
我将证明生活与信息之间的类比[由戴维斯（Davies（2000），沃克和戴维斯（Walker and Davies）（2013），戴森（Dyson）（1979），格里克（2011），库尔兹维尔（2012），沃德（2012），沃德（2009））等作者说，这似乎是人为的效果，这可能是一种预期的效果，例如，这是一个不断的效果。为了使人造思维代表宇宙生命进化中的预期进步也是毫无根据的和无效的。但是，如果我们准备承认（尽管我们不应该这样做）这种推理方法是有效的，我将证明生命和信息之间的类比，即人造思想可能代表了宇宙中的生活进化中的预期进步，似乎表明了某种类型的生活学对信息的降低到信息中，但生物学分别是化学或物理学的差异，与生活和物理学相反，与生活相反，与生活相反。
I'll show that the kind of analogy between life and information [argue for by authors such as Davies (2000), Walker and Davies (2013), Dyson (1979), Gleick (2011), Kurzweil (2012), Ward (2009)], that seems to be central to the effect that artificial mind may represents an expected advance in the life evolution in Universe, is like the design argument and that if the design argument is unfounded and invalid, the argument to the effect that artificial mind may represents an expected advance in the life evolution in Universe is also unfounded and invalid. However, if we are prepared to admit (though we should not do) this method of reasoning as valid, I'll show that the analogy between life and information to the effect that artificial mind may represents an expected advance in the life evolution in Universe seems suggest some type of reductionism of life to information, but biology respectively chemistry or physics are not reductionist, contrary to what seems to be suggested by the analogy between life and information.
