论文标题

残留网络的非线性太阳能磁场校准方法

A nonlinear solar magnetic field calibration method for the filter-based magnetograph by the residual network

论文作者

Guo, Jingjing, Bai, Xianyong, Deng, Yuanyong, Liu, Hui, Lin, Jiaben, Su, Jiangtao, Yang, Xiao, Ji, Kaifan

论文摘要

基于过滤器的磁力仪的太阳磁场校准方法通常是在弱场近似下的线性校准方法,由于磁饱和效应,无法很好地产生强磁场区域。我们尝试提供一种新方法来借助神经网络进行非线性磁校准,以获得更准确的磁场。我们使用Hinode/SP的数据来构建培训,验证和测试数据集。从SP观察到的所有112个波长点中选择了一个波长点的窄带stokes I,Q,U和V映射,以模拟基于滤波器的磁力仪的单波长观测值。我们使用剩余网络对Stokes图和向量磁场之间的非线性关系进行建模。经过广泛的性能分析后,发现训练有素的模型可以推断纵向磁通密度,横向磁通密度和从窄带Stokes图的方位角,具有与112波长点相当的精确性结果。此外,生产的地图比反转结果要干净得多。该方法可以有效地克服磁饱和效应,并比线性校准方法更好地推断强磁区域。对于纵向和横向磁通密度,测试样品与标准数据的残余误差大约为50 g。使用我们先前的多层感知方法的方法约为100 g,表明新方法在磁校准中更准确。

The method of solar magnetic field calibration for the filter-based magnetograph is normally the linear calibration method under weak-field approximation that cannot generate the strong magnetic field region well due to the magnetic saturation effect. We try to provide a new method to carry out the nonlinear magnetic calibration with the help of neural networks to obtain more accurate magnetic fields. We employed the data from Hinode/SP to construct a training, validation and test dataset. The narrow-band Stokes I, Q, U, and V maps at one wavelength point were selected from all the 112 wavelength points observed by SP so as to simulate the single-wavelength observations of the filter-based magnetograph. We used the residual network to model the nonlinear relationship between the Stokes maps and the vector magnetic fields. After an extensive performance analysis, it is found that the trained models could infer the longitudinal magnetic flux density, the transverse magnetic flux density, and the azimuth angle from the narrow-band Stokes maps with a precision comparable to the inversion results using 112 wavelength points. Moreover, the maps that were produced are much cleaner than the inversion results. The method can effectively overcome the magnetic saturation effect and infer the strong magnetic region much better than the linear calibration method. The residual errors of test samples to standard data are mostly about 50 G for both the longitudinal and transverse magnetic flux density. The values are about 100 G with our previous method of multilayer perceptron, indicating that the new method is more accurate in magnetic calibration.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源