论文标题
多企业投资网络中的最佳抵押品
Optimal Collaterals in Multi-Enterprise Investment Networks
论文作者
论文摘要
我们研究网络投资市场,每个代理商(Vertex)可以投资于与她相关的任何企业,同时,从她所链接的其他代理商那里为她的公司的企业筹集资金。由于公司违约,无法提高足够的资本业绩,无法投资他人。我们的主要目的是研究附带合同在处理战略风险中的作用,这些风险可以在整个网络中传播到一系列违约的级联。我们采用机制设计方法,并解决资本提升者为投资者提供的最佳抵押合同计划。这些合同旨在维持有效的投资水平,作为独特的NASH均衡,同时最大程度地减少总抵押品。 我们的主要结果将网络环境与其非网络环境进行对比(其中一组投资者和资本提升者是脱节的)。我们表明,对于无环投资网络,网络环境不需要任何其他抵押品,并且可以通过资本促进者和其投资者之间的最佳双边抵押合同来完全处理系统性风险。不幸的是,这不是环状投资网络的情况。我们表明,双边签订不足以解决系统性风险,并且市场将需要外部实体来为所有资本提升者设计全球抵押计划。此外,与相应的非网络环境相比,即使在简单的循环投资网络中,也可以任意更高的均衡水平作为独特的均衡,将维持有效的投资水平的最低总抵押品的最低总抵押。此外,对于一个企业和网络,我们都证明了计算复杂性结果。
We study a market of investments on networks, where each agent (vertex) can invest in any enterprise linked to her, and at the same time, raise capital for her firm's enterprise from other agents she is linked to. Failing to raise sufficient capital results with the firm defaulting, being unable to invest in others. Our main objective is to examine the role of collateral contracts in handling the strategic risk that can propagate to a systemic risk throughout the network in a cascade of defaults. We take a mechanism-design approach and solve for the optimal scheme of collateral contracts that capital raisers offer their investors. These contracts aim at sustaining the efficient level of investment as a unique Nash equilibrium, while minimizing the total collateral. Our main results contrast the network environment with its non-network counterpart (where the sets of investors and capital raisers are disjoint). We show that for acyclic investment networks, the network environment does not necessitate any additional collaterals, and systemic risk can be fully handled by optimal bilateral collateral contracts between capital raisers and their investors. This is, unfortunately, not the case for cyclic investment networks. We show that bilateral contracting will not suffice to resolve systemic risk, and the market will need an external entity to design a global collateral scheme for all capital raisers. Furthermore, the minimum total collateral that will sustain the efficient level of investment as a unique equilibrium may be arbitrarily higher, even in simple cyclic investment networks, compared with its corresponding non-network environment. Additionally, we prove computational-complexity results, both for a single enterprise and for networks.