论文标题

软件工程研究的经验标准

Empirical Standards for Software Engineering Research

论文作者

Ralph, Paul, Ali, Nauman bin, Baltes, Sebastian, Bianculli, Domenico, Diaz, Jessica, Dittrich, Yvonne, Ernst, Neil, Felderer, Michael, Feldt, Robert, Filieri, Antonio, de França, Breno Bernard Nicolau, Furia, Carlo Alberto, Gay, Greg, Gold, Nicolas, Graziotin, Daniel, He, Pinjia, Hoda, Rashina, Juristo, Natalia, Kitchenham, Barbara, Lenarduzzi, Valentina, Martínez, Jorge, Melegati, Jorge, Mendez, Daniel, Menzies, Tim, Molleri, Jefferson, Pfahl, Dietmar, Robbes, Romain, Russo, Daniel, Saarimäki, Nyyti, Sarro, Federica, Taibi, Davide, Siegmund, Janet, Spinellis, Diomidis, Staron, Miroslaw, Stol, Klaas, Storey, Margaret-Anne, Taibi, Davide, Tamburri, Damian, Torchiano, Marco, Treude, Christoph, Turhan, Burak, Wang, Xiaofeng, Vegas, Sira

论文摘要

经验标准是科学界对特定研究期望的自然语言模型(例如,问卷调查)。 ACM Sigsoft Paper和同行评审质量计划为软件工程中常用的研究方法生成了经验标准。这些生活文件应进行不断修订,以反映围绕研究最佳实践的共识,它将提高研究质量,并使同伴评论更有效,可靠,透明和公平。

Empirical Standards are natural-language models of a scientific community's expectations for a specific kind of study (e.g. a questionnaire survey). The ACM SIGSOFT Paper and Peer Review Quality Initiative generated empirical standards for research methods commonly used in software engineering. These living documents, which should be continuously revised to reflect evolving consensus around research best practices, will improve research quality and make peer review more effective, reliable, transparent and fair.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源