论文标题
会议记录在研究评估中的重要性：评估会议影响的方法
The Importance of Conference Proceedings in Research Evaluation: a Methodology for Assessing Conference Impact
论文作者
论文摘要
会议是科学交流的重要工具。在计算机科学等学科中，超过50％的原始研究结果发表在会议记录中。在这项研究中，我们分析了会议论文在各个学科中的作用，并根据会议论文集和Scimago期刊（SJR）提出了一种研究评估的替代方法。该研究的结果是会议程序列表，通过类似于SJR Journal Quartiles的几个学科中的第1 Q4 Q4。该文献计量驱动的排名与计算机科学中专家驱动的核心排名的比较表明，重叠了62％，并且类别分布的平均级别相关性显着。此外，工程学的38次会议记录（列表的45％）和计算机科学的23个会议（列表的32％）的SJR级别对应于这些领域的第一个四分位期刊。这再次强调了这些学科中会议的非凡重要性。
Conferences are an essential tool for scientific communication. In disciplines such as Computer Science, over 50% of original research results are published in conference proceedings. In this study, we have analysed the role of conference proceedings in various disciplines and propose an alternative approach to research evaluation based on conference proceedings and Scimago Journal Rank (SJR). The result of the study is a list of conference proceedings, categorised Q1 - Q4 in several disciplines by analogy with SJR journal quartiles. The comparison of this bibliometric-driven ranking with the expert-driven CORE ranking in Computer Science showed a 62% overlap, as well as a significant average rank correlation of the category distribution. Moreover, 38 conference proceedings in Engineering (45% of the list) and 23 in Computer Science (32% of the list) have an SJR level corresponding to the first quartile journals in these areas. This again emphasises the exceptional importance of conferences in these disciplines.
