论文标题
贝尔非局部性的测量依赖性成本:因果关系与倒退模型
Measurement-dependence cost for Bell nonlocality: causal vs retrocausal models
论文作者
论文摘要
基于铃铛非局部性的设备独立协议,例如量子密钥分布和随机性生成,必须确保没有对手可以先验了解测量结果。这需要一个测量独立性假设:测量的选择与影响测量结果的任何其他基本变量不相关。相反,放松的测量独立性允许对贝尔非局部性进行完全“因果”模拟。我们为基础变量和测量设置之间的相互信息构建了最有效的模拟,用于clauser-horne-shorne-shimony-holt(CHSH)方案,并发现最大量子违规需要仅$ \ sim 0.080 $ bits的相互信息。任何用于实施此仿真的物理设备都可以使对手完全了解由设备独立协议生成的加密密钥或基于违反CHSH不平等的“随机”数字。我们还表明,CHSH方案的先前模型仅需要$ \ sim 0.046 $位才能模拟最大量子违规行为,对应于最有效的“逆转录子”模拟,其中未来的测量设置必定会影响早期的源变量。这可以被视为先前模型的非物理局限性,也可以视为基于其更高效率的延迟性的论点。还讨论了有关最大纠缠的两量态状态以及超确定性,单方面和曲折的因果模型的因果和倒退模型。
Device independent protocols based on Bell nonlocality, such as quantum key distribution and randomness generation, must ensure no adversary can have prior knowledge of the measurement outcomes. This requires a measurement independence assumption: that the choice of measurement is uncorrelated with any other underlying variables that influence the measurement outcomes. Conversely, relaxing measurement independence allows for a fully `causal' simulation of Bell nonlocality. We construct the most efficient such simulation, as measured by the mutual information between the underlying variables and the measurement settings, for the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) scenario, and find that the maximal quantum violation requires a mutual information of just $\sim 0.080$ bits. Any physical device built to implement this simulation allows an adversary to have full knowledge of a cryptographic key or `random' numbers generated by a device independent protocol based on violation of the CHSH inequality. We also show that a previous model for the CHSH scenario, requiring only $\sim 0.046$ bits to simulate the maximal quantum violation, corresponds to the most efficient `retrocausal' simulation, in which future measurement settings necessarily influence earlier source variables. This may be viewed either as an unphysical limitation of the prior model, or as an argument for retrocausality on the grounds of its greater efficiency. Causal and retrocausal models are also discussed for maximally entangled two-qubit states, as well as superdeterministic, one-sided and zigzag causal models.