论文标题
使用经验数据在国家一级上对未来的SARS-COV-2感染预测未来的SARS-COV-2感染,以评估响应效果
Prospective Prediction of Future SARS-CoV-2 Infections Using Empirical Data on a National Level to Gauge Response Effectiveness
论文作者
论文摘要
预测准确预期的未来COVID-19案例数对于正确评估任何治疗或预防措施的有效性至关重要。这项研究旨在确定最合适的数学模型,以预先预测预期的案件数量而无需任何干预措施。分析了28个国家的Covid-19流行病的总案例总数,并将其安装在几个简单的费率模型中,包括Logistic,Gompertz,二次,简单的正方形和简单的指数增长模型。所得模型参数用于推断最新数据的预测。虽然Gompertz增长模型(平均R2 = 0.998)最能拟合当前数据,但在最终情况下的不确定性中,不确定性使未来的预测具有易于错误的逻辑模型。在其他模型中,二次率模型(平均R2 = 0.992)拟合了25(89%)国家的当前数据,该数据由R2值确定。简单的正方形和二次模型准确地预测了未来的总案例37和36天,而简单指数模型仅15天。简单的指数模型显着高估了未来案例的总数,而二次和简单的正方形模型则没有。这些结果表明,可以在不需要复杂的人口行为模型的情况下,对给定国家的案件负荷进行准确的预测,并对当前的规定性措施针对疾病传播的效力产生可靠的评估。
Predicting an accurate expected number of future COVID-19 cases is essential to properly evaluate the effectiveness of any treatment or preventive measure. This study aimed to identify the most appropriate mathematical model to prospectively predict the expected number of cases without any intervention. The total number of cases for the COVID-19 epidemic in 28 countries was analyzed and fitted to several simple rate models including the logistic, Gompertz, quadratic, simple square, and simple exponential growth models. The resulting model parameters were used to extrapolate predictions for more recent data. While the Gompertz growth models (mean R2 = 0.998) best fitted the current data, uncertainties in the eventual case limit made future predictions with logistic models prone to errors. Of the other models, the quadratic rate model (mean R2 = 0.992) fitted the current data best for 25 (89 %) countries as determined by R2 values. The simple square and quadratic models accurately predicted the number of future total cases 37 and 36 days in advance respectively, compared to only 15 days for the simple exponential model. The simple exponential model significantly overpredicted the total number of future cases while the quadratic and simple square models did not. These results demonstrated that accurate future predictions of the case load in a given country can be made significantly in advance without the need for complicated models of population behavior and generate a reliable assessment of the efficacy of current prescriptive measures against disease spread.