论文标题
集体回应Reddit和Wikipedia对Covid-19的媒体覆盖范围
Collective response to the media coverage of COVID-19 Pandemic on Reddit and Wikipedia
论文作者
论文摘要
流行病暴发期间信息的暴露和消耗可能会改变风险感知,触发行为改变,并最终影响疾病的演变。因此,这是由主流媒体和公众反应绘制信息传播信息的最重要意义。但是,我们对COVID-19大流行期间这种暴露响应动态的理解仍然有限。在本文中,我们提供了媒体报道和在线集体关注的特征,并在四个国家 /地区对Covid-19的大流行:意大利,英国,美国和加拿大。为此,我们收集了一个异质数据集,其中包括由主流媒体出版的227,768个在线新闻文章和13,448个YouTube视频,107,898个用户帖子和3,829,309条在社交媒体平台REDDIT上的评论,以及278,456,892 Covid-19与COVID-11相关的视图。我们的结果表明,公众的关注是用户对Reddit的活动进行量化的,并在Wikipedia页面上进行了主动搜索,主要是由媒体报道驱动的,并迅速下降,而新闻曝光和Covid-19发病率仍然很高。此外,通过使用一种无监督的动态主题建模方法,我们表明,尽管媒体和在线用户专用于不同主题的关注符合其时间模式,但有趣的偏差却出现了。总体而言,我们的发现为解释公众对当前全球卫生紧急情况的看法/反应提供了另一个钥匙,并提出了有关注意饱和对集体意识,风险感知以及对行为改变倾向的影响的疑问。
The exposure and consumption of information during epidemic outbreaks may alter risk perception, trigger behavioural changes, and ultimately affect the evolution of the disease. It is thus of the uttermost importance to map information dissemination by mainstream media outlets and public response. However, our understanding of this exposure-response dynamic during COVID-19 pandemic is still limited. In this paper, we provide a characterization of media coverage and online collective attention to COVID-19 pandemic in four countries: Italy, United Kingdom, United States, and Canada. For this purpose, we collect an heterogeneous dataset including 227,768 online news articles and 13,448 Youtube videos published by mainstream media, 107,898 users posts and 3,829,309 comments on the social media platform Reddit, and 278,456,892 views to COVID-19 related Wikipedia pages. Our results show that public attention, quantified as users activity on Reddit and active searches on Wikipedia pages, is mainly driven by media coverage and declines rapidly, while news exposure and COVID-19 incidence remain high. Furthermore, by using an unsupervised, dynamical topic modeling approach, we show that while the attention dedicated to different topics by media and online users are in good accordance, interesting deviations emerge in their temporal patterns. Overall, our findings offer an additional key to interpret public perception/response to the current global health emergency and raise questions about the effects of attention saturation on collective awareness, risk perception and thus on tendencies towards behavioural changes.