论文标题
实验，临时，在线，大学间学生电子竞争：经验教训
Experimental, ad hoc, online, inter-university student e-contest during the pandemic: Lessons learned
论文作者
论文摘要
我们正在向当前大流行期间举行的学生提供从电子竞争中学到的经验教训。我们将电子竞争与以前的10版相同但面对面的比赛进行了比较。虽然显然是由于虚拟的竞争并没有遭受苦难，但注意到一些缺点。主要结论是：基本的互连性意味着没有严重的技术问题，但是互连性比面对面的互连性更有限。在线陪审团互动比面对面的互动更差。人为因素，组织过程中的不确定性较高，而在当地组织者那里花费的时间更少是主要的限制因素；对参与和评估公平性的担忧更高；非自愿性别歧视似乎较低，但仍然存在。与隐私有关，包括差异隐私，存在严重的关注；出现了一些主题和评估过程的某些特殊性，但目前尚不清楚它们是否与竞争的在线性质有关，在大流行期间对参与者的额外压力，其他因素，还是随机的。尽管某些结论可能与所分析案例密切相关，但有些结论足以参加其他在线比赛。
We are reporting on lessons learned from an e-contest for students held during the current pandemic. We compare the e-contest with the 10 previous editions of the same but face-to-face contest. While apparently the competition did not suffer because of being a virtual one, some disadvantages were noted. The main conclusions are: the basic interconnectivity means arise no serious technical issue, but the interconnectivity is more limited than the face-to-face one; online jury-competitors interactivity is poorer than face-to-face interactivity; human factors, higher uncertainties in the organization process, and less time to spend in the process for the local organizers are major limiting factors; concerns on the participation and evaluation fairness are higher; involuntary gender discrimination seems lower, but persists; there are serious concerns related to privacy, including differential privacy; some peculiarities of the presented topics and of the evaluation process emerged, but it is unclear if they are related to the online nature of the competition, to the extra stress on the participants during the pandemic, to other factors, or are random. While some conclusions may be intimately related to the analyzed case, some are general enough for being worth to other online competitions.
