论文标题
镜像langmuir探针与气体吹气成像测量的比较,壁c-mod刮擦层中间歇性波动
Comparison between mirror Langmuir probe and gas puff imaging measurements of intermittent fluctuations in the Alcator C-Mod scrape-off layer
论文作者
论文摘要
在壁c-mod tokamak中,研究了刮擦层(SOL)等离子体波动的统计特性。在镜像langmuir探针(MLP)和从相同等离子体放电的样品中,比较了血浆波动以及描述波动的参数。通过对MLP电子密度和温度测量值合成的线排放时间序列数据的分析来补充这种比较。 MLP和GPI观察到的波动通常显示出阶统一的相对波动振幅,以及正偏斜和扁平的概率密度函数。这样的数据时间序列通过已建立的随机框架很好地描述,该框架将数据建模为不相关的双面指数脉冲的叠加。该过程的最重要参数是间歇性参数,γ=τd /τw,其中τd表示单个脉冲的持续时间,τW给出了连续脉冲之间的平均等待时间。在这里,我们使用一种新的反卷积方法显示,可以从数据的不同统计数据中始终估算这些参数。我们还表明,由MLP和GPI诊断所采样的数据的统计特性非常相似。最后,将GPI信号与合成线发射时间序列进行比较表明,所测量的发射强度不能仅通过忽略中性粒子动力学的简化模型来解释。
Statistical properties of the scrape-off layer (SOL) plasma fluctuations are studied in ohmically heated plasmas in the Alcator C-Mod tokamak. For the first time, plasma fluctuations as well as parameters that describe the fluctuations are compared across measurements from a mirror Langmuir probe (MLP) and from gas-puff imaging (GPI) that sample the same plasma discharge. This comparison is complemented by an analysis of line emission time-series data, synthesized from the MLP electron density and temperature measurements. The fluctuations observed by the MLP and GPI typically display relative fluctuation amplitudes of order unity together with positively skewed and flattened probability density functions. Such data time series are well described by an established stochastic framework which model the data as a superposition of uncorrelated, two-sided exponential pulses. The most important parameter of the process is the intermittency parameter, γ = τd / τw where τd denotes the duration time of a single pulse and τw gives the average waiting time between consecutive pulses. Here we show, using a new deconvolution method, that these parameters can be consistently estimated from different statistics of the data. We also show that the statistical properties of the data sampled by the MLP and GPI diagnostic are very similar. Finally, a comparison of the GPI signal to the synthetic line-emission time series suggests that the measured emission intensity can not be explained solely by a simplified model which neglects neutral particle dynamics.