论文标题
STEM数据集的真实科学经验:大专结果和潜在的性别影响
Authentic Science Experiences with STEM Datasets: Post-secondary Results and Potential Gender Influences
论文作者
论文摘要
背景:从医疗保健工作到天文学研究的STEM领域中,数据集技能用于。很少有领域明确地教学学生可以分析数据集的技能,但是对真实科学的推动力越来越意味着应该教授这些技能。 目的:总体动机是在天文学背景下了解学习数据集技能的学习。具体来说,当参与者使用有关类星体的天文数据数据集与200个进入的Google表格合作时,他们正在学习什么,他们如何学习以及谁在学习学习? 样本:作者研究了一组匹配的参与者(n = 87),由54名大学生(34名男性,18名女性)和33名科学教育者(16名男性,17名女性)组成。 设计和方法:参与者探索了三相数据集活动,并获得了八个问题的多项选择前/后测试,涵盖了分析数据集和天文学内容的技能,涵盖了Bloom分类法的问题。比较了测试前/测试后的评分,并根据人群为子样本进行t检验。 结果:参与者展示了数据集技能和天文学内容的学习,表明可以通过这种天文学活动来学习数据集技能。参与者在召回和综合问题中都表现出收益,表明学习是非顺序的。女性本科生的学习水平低于其他人群。 结论:该研究的含义包括在学院后的STEM教育和科学教育工作者中更强大的数据集,以及需要进一步调查讲师如何改善女性本科生面临的挑战。
Background: Dataset skills are used in STEM fields from healthcare work to astronomy research. Few fields explicitly teach students the skills to analyze datasets, and yet the increasing push for authentic science implies these skills should be taught. Purpose: The overarching motivation is to understand learning of dataset skills within an astronomy context. Specifically, when participants work with a 200-entry Google Sheets dataset of astronomical data about quasars, what are they learning, how are they learning it, and who is doing the learning? Sample: The authors studied a matched set of participants (n=87) consisting of 54 university undergraduate students (34 male, 18 female), and 33 science educators (16 male, 17 female). Design and methods: Participants explored a three-phase dataset activity and were given an eight-question multiple-choice pre/post-test covering skills of analyzing datasets and astronomy content, with questions spanning Bloom's Taxonomy. Pre/post-test scores were compared and a t-test performed for subsamples by population. Results: Participants exhibited learning of both dataset skills and astronomy content, indicating that dataset skills can be learned through this astronomy activity. Participants exhibited gains in both recall and synthesis questions, indicating learning is non-sequential. Female undergraduate students exhibited lower levels of learning than other populations. Conclusions: Implications of the study include a stronger dataset focus in post-secondary STEM education and among science educators, and the need for further investigation into how instructors can ameliorate the challenges faced by female undergraduate students.